Appeal 2026/AR/917: What I Asked the Liège Court of Appeal
On 31 May 2026, I filed my appeal application with the Liège Court of Appeal. Case number: 2026/AR/917. This step marks a decisive moment in a fight that has lasted more than a decade. Why appeal? The January 2021 jud…
On 31 May 2026, I filed my appeal application with the Liège Court of Appeal. Case number: 2026/AR/917.
This step marks a decisive moment in a fight that has lasted more than a decade.
Why appeal?
The January 2021 judgment of the Namur Commercial Court was handed down by default — meaning I was neither present nor even informed of the proceedings. Olivier Taylor, director of Vivace Music, had claimed not to know my address when serving the summons.
Yet his own emails from February 2021 prove that he knew perfectly well how to reach me (Exhibit 7, on file).
The hearing of 25 June 2026
At the admissibility hearing, Taylor himself declared that he "did not have De Feyter's address" at the time of the summons. This contradictory statement supports the admissibility of my appeal.
The next hearing is scheduled for 10 September 2026.
What I am claiming
- Annulment of the default judgment of January 2021
- Recognition of my shareholder rights in Vivace Music
- Payment of unpaid receivables dating back to 2012
- Damages for moral and professional harm
The appeal application is a public document, accessible in the exhibits attached to this file.
Frédéric De Feyter — June 2026
🗳️ Réactions de la communauté