From blank page to public case

Start without exposing yourself

Your case is born fully private. You add your exhibits — documents, photos, audio recordings — in any order. The AI re-reads, spots date inconsistencies, flags missing pieces and rephrases your facts in legally neutral language. You own every word. By default, nobody sees what you upload.

A first look before any human eyes

Before your case reaches anyone, the AI checks three things: the internal coherence of the facts, the presence of at least one supporting exhibit, and the absence of details that would expose you needlessly. Third parties are automatically anonymised into initials. It's not a moral filter — it's quality control.

People, not an algorithm

Sentinels are community members chosen by their peers for their consistency and seriousness. They read the anonymised version of your case — your names replaced by initials, your company by an abbreviation. Their role: making sure what reaches the jury is factual, readable and fair.

The community rules on the facts

The jury votes on what the Sentinels validated. Jurors don't know who you are. They judge acts, not people — "Mr T., manager of company V." is enough to judge whether an injustice is plausible. The vote score is public. The names are not.

Naming publicly requires an instruction

An anonymised case can stay online indefinitely. If you want the names to appear — yours to testify, those of the people involved to identify them — your case must go through an instruction. A human reviewer, trained in the law of your country, verifies your exhibits, your identity and the coherence of the whole. It's the only path. It's also the only guarantee that what is published withstands a challenge.

The instruction is a paid option. A third person — a relative, a Builder from the community — can offer it in your place if you can't afford it.